Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joyce Brand's avatar

This is such an important point. I was happy that we dodged the Kamala bullet because the left has shown how authoritarian and insane their rule is, but I had my fears about Trump and whether he would do more harm than good. The first couple of weeks of Trumps's administration were promising in the "promises made, promises kept" campaign. He did some very good things, but even then there were hints of his authoritarianism. If I pointed out how harmful tariffs are to the side imposing them, people said I just didn't understand his strategy because he was so skillful at the art of the deal. It was like, how dare I question his actions when he is risking his life to save us from the evils of the progressive left. Then the other day, I heard that he posted something on Truth Social about how Walmart should "eat the tariffs" rather than raise their prices. That revealed such a profound ignorance of the basic laws of economics I was shocked. There might be cases where there is an arguable trade-off that mitigates the harms of tariffs, although I don't see it. However, there is no excuse for not knowing that when you forcibly raise the costs of inputs with taxes, businesses have to raise the prices of their products or cut quality or go out of business. In any of those cases, it is the customer who ends up "eating the tariffs." Yet Trump is supremely confident that whatever he decides is right for everyone. Matt Walsh seems to have the same hubris.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

I’m done with having a “camp”. Everyone disappoints. Matt Walsh is decent on some things. Atrocious on others.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts