I’ve got a confession: I’m a sucker for accents. I grew up on a steady diet of Monty Python and other BBC fare — and, of course Sean Connery Bond flicks. So, when someone opens their mouth and out comes a lilting Irish brogue or a clipped British drawl, I’m hooked.
But over the years, I’ve been noticing something that’s got my Spidey senses tingling. There’s a breed of American out there—naturalized citizens, usually, with foreign accents still clinging to their vowels—who seem way too eager to send our kids off to die in some far-flung land. And I’m starting to wonder: why are these folks such warmongers?
You’ve seen them on cable news, haven’t you? The pundit with the Eastern European inflection or the Middle Eastern cadence, waxing poetic about “American leadership” and the need to “project strength.”
They’re polished, they’re passionate, and they’ve got that exotic flair that makes you feel like you’re getting a global perspective. But then you listen closer, and it’s all “bomb this, sanction that, regime-change the other.” It’s like they’ve got a personal vendetta against half the planet—and they want us to foot the bill in blood and treasure.
Now, I’m not saying every immigrant with an accent is a warmonger. That’d be silly. But there’s a pattern with some of these high-profile types. Think about it: Henry Kissinger, German accent and all, practically wrote the playbook for Cold War meddling. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Polish roots, pushed us into arming the Mujahideen like it was a weekend hobby.
More recently, you’ve got folks like Fiona Hill—Russian expert, British accent—who’s spent years warning about Putin like he’s the boogeyman under her bed, all while cheerleading NATO expansion.
And then there’s Ayaan Hirsi Ali. At the 2021 FreedomFest in South Dakota, I listened to this heavily-accented woman debate the great Scott Horton on stage about foreign policy. Something about that thick accent shouting about all the wars “we” must fight really annoyed me.
These certainly aren’t peaceniks. They’re hawks with a backstory.
So what’s the deal? Here’s my theory, and it’s not pretty. A lot of these folks grew up in places where geopolitics wasn’t just a cable news segment—it was life or death. They fled wars, dictators, or collapsing regimes, and now they’re here, safe in the U.S., but with a chip on their shoulder.
They’ve got old scores to settle, and America’s military might is their shiny new toy. It’s not enough to enjoy the freedom; they want revenge, or at least a world remade in their image. And because they’ve got that foreign cred—accents that scream “I’ve seen things”—we’re supposed to nod along like they’re the wise elders of the tribe.
But hold up. Why should we trust them? I mean, really. If you grew up in, say, Tehran or Kyiv, and you’ve got a grudge against the mullahs or Moscow, that’s your baggage—not mine.
I get it, history’s messy, and trauma’s real. But when you start preaching about “American interests” in a way that conveniently aligns with your homeland’s enemies, I’m calling bullshit. It’s not our job to be your proxy army. And it’s damn suspicious when your solution to every problem is more drones, more bases, more “strategic deterrence.”
Look at the flip side. Plenty of native-born Americans are doves, and I love them for it. They’re skeptical of endless wars, tired of the Pentagon’s budget black hole. You don’t hear Bernie Sanders or Rand Paul sounding off with a funny accent about glassing Pyongyang.
So why is it that some of these naturalized voices—think tanks, op-eds, CNN or Fox News panels—keep pushing the gas pedal on conflict? Maybe it’s not about America at all. Maybe it’s about their America, a fantasy where Uncle Sam’s the global enforcer for their personal crusades.
Here’s where I land: I don’t care how charming your accent is—hell, I’d listen to Idris Elba read the phone book—but if you’re an American by passport, not birth, and you’re itching for a fight overseas, I’m watching you. Closely.
Because the last thing we need is another war sold to us by someone who’s already got one foot in another country’s past. Call me paranoid, but I’d rather keep my suspicions sharp than my enlistment papers signed.
Naturally,
Adam
PS: Wanna learn more about why war is bad? Check out Liberty Classroom. Wisdom awaits.
One of your best. Heartfelt
You forgot Cuba. There are 2nd and now 3rd generation Cubans in south Florida who dictate our policy, which is that they have to get their property returned to them and be compensated by the revolutionaries. Anything less is unacceptable. So we continue to hold the same "not one inch until..." policy with Cuba.
I agree the Cuban government has no right to confiscate private property. I agree that they should be compensated by the Cuban government for damages incurred over the last 66 years, insomuch as that is possible. But I don't agree at all with the "Let's you and him fight" attitude they have when it comes to voting for representatives. But they're concentrated enough and large enough to swing elections, so politicians have to pander to them.